Molecular mapping of the determinants involved in human Staufen–ribosome association
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The human double-stranded (ds) RNA-binding protein Staufen (hStau) is considered to have a role in RNA transport and its localization. By using sedimentation analysis on sucrose gradients, we showed that the Staufen isoform with an apparent molecular mass of 55 kDa (Stau(55)) co-fractionated with ribosomes and associated with both the 40 and 60 S ribosomal subunits, suggesting that the Staufen isoform hStau(55) plays some role in translation. To map the determinant(s) involved in this association, we generated a series of deletion mutants and analysed their subcellular distribution by cell fractionation and fluorescent immunomicroscopy. Our results demonstrated that multiple determinants promote hStau(55)-ribosome association via both an RNA-binding-dependent mechanism and protein-protein interaction. The RNA-binding activity of the ds RNA-binding protein domain 3 (dsRBD3) but not that of dsRBD4 is the first determinant. Although necessary for stable association with ribosomes, dsRBD3 alone is not sufficient and needs other determinants as co-factors. Consistently, when expressed together, dsRBD4 and the tubulin-binding domain constitute the minimal Stau(55)/ribosome protein-protein association domain. This region of Stau(55) is sufficient to associate with ribosomes independently, but requires the RNA-binding activity of dsRBD3 for complete association. Thus the results are consistent with a putative role for Stau(55) in the regulation of translation.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".