Acetylcholine and tachykinins involvement in the caffeine‐induced biphasic change in intracellular Ca<sup>2+</sup> in bovine airway smooth muscle
Bibliographic record
Abstract
1. Caffeine has been widely used as a pharmacological tool to evaluate Ca(2+) release from the sarcoplasmic reticulum in isolated smooth muscle cells. However, in nervous tissue this drug also causes neurotransmitters release, which might cause additional effects when smooth muscle strips are evaluated. To assess this last possibility, simultaneous measurements of contraction and cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration (using Fura-2/AM) were carried out in bovine airway smooth muscle strips during caffeine stimulation. 2. A first stimulation (S1, n=11) with caffeine (10 mM) induced a biphasic change in cytosolic Ca(2+), which consisted of a transient Ca(2+) peak (254+/-40 nM, X+/-SEM) followed by a plateau (92+/-13 nM), and a transient contraction (204.72+/-31.56 mg tension mg tissue(-1)). A second caffeine stimulation (S2) produced a similar response but these parameters had a different magnitude. The S2/S1 ratios for these parameters were 0.69+/-0.02, 0.83+/-0.06 and 1.01+/-0.03, respectively. Addition of omega-conotoxin GVIA (1 micro M) and tetrodotoxin (3.1 micro M) before S2 significantly diminished these S2/S1 ratios (0.26+/-0.05, 0.26+/-0.09 and 0.64+/-0.11, respectively, n=5, P<0.05), implicating the neurotransmitters release involvement in the response to caffeine. A similar effect (P<0.01) was observed with atropine (1 micro M, n=4), the fragment 4-11 of substance P (SP) (an SP receptor antagonist, 10 micro M, n=5), and with both substances (n=4). 3. We discarded a direct effect of omega-conotoxin GVIA (1 micro M) plus tetrodotoxin (3.1 micro M) or of atropine (1 micro M) plus SP fragment 4-11 on smooth muscle cells because they did not modify caffeine responses in isolated tracheal myocytes. 4. We confirmed by HPLC that caffeine increased the release of acetylcholine (from 0.43+/-0.19 to 2.07+/-0.56 nM mg tissue(-1), P<0.02) in bovine airway smooth muscle strips. Detection of substance P by ELISA was not statistically different after caffeine stimulation (geometric means before and after caffeine, 0.69 vs. 1.97 pg ml(-1) mg tissue(-1), respectively, P=0.053). 5. We concluded that acetylcholine and tachykinins release are involved in the caffeine-induced biphasic changes in cytosolic Ca(2+) concentration.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".