MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069468639 · doi:10.1029/2004gl020324

Solar heating by the near‐IR CO<sub>2</sub> bands in the mesosphere

2004· article· en· W2069468639 on OpenAlexaffabout
V. I. Fomichev, V. P. Ogibalov, S. R. Beagley

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysical Research Letters · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMesosphereAtmospheric sciencesAtmosphere (unit)ThermalEnvironmental scienceAbsorption (acoustics)InfraredNear-infrared spectroscopySolar energyComputational physicsPhysicsMaterials scienceMeteorologyOpticsStratosphere

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Absorption of solar energy by the near‐infrared (NIR) CO2 bands provides an important source of heating in the mesosphere. At 60–85 km, this source exceeds 1 K day−1 and contributes up to 30% of the total solar heating. Calculation of the solar heating in the NIR CO2 bands requires consideration of complex non‐local thermodynamic equilibrium (non‐LTE) processes. The small energy effect, narrow region of importance, and the necessity to consider non‐LTE effects, have accounted for the absence of an adequate parameterization for the NIR CO2 bands. Recently a parameterization has been developed and implemented into the Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model. Numerical experiments with this model have shown that inclusion of the NIR CO2 heating results in a significant warming of up to 8 K in the mesosphere for the current CO2 amount but does not significantly change the model thermal response induced by the doubling of CO2.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.132
Threshold uncertainty score0.263

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.250 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations35
Published2004
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysical Research LettersSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207