Alemtuzumab As Therapy for Steroid Refractory Acute Gvhd: Promising Efficacy but Higher Rate of Infectious Complications Based on Observational Study
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cell dose is a major criterion for cord blood unit (CBU) selection for allogeneic stem cell transplantation (allo-SCT). The aim of this study was the characterization of CBU cellular composition after thaw, and comparisonwith corresponding values at cryopreservation as reported by cord blood (CB) banks. The study included 87 CBUs, that were thawed for infusion in the context of single (n1⁄43) or dual-unit (n1⁄442) allo-SCT in adults with hematologic malignancies, from 8/2006 to 6/2013. Upon thawing, the cryoprotective solution (DMSO 10%) was either removed by centrifugation/washing (38 CBUs) or diluted in a less hypertonic solution of Dextran 40/Human Albumin 2.5% (49 CBUs). Total nucleated cells (TNC) were measured with a hematology analyzer, while enumeration of CD34+ stem cells was performed by singleplatform flow cytometry, according to ISHAGE guidelines. In 49 units, TNC and CD34+ cell viability was evaluated by addition of 7-AAD dye and sequential Boolean gating strategy. TNC counts after thawing were lower compared to their values at freezing (Wilcoxon test, p <10-4), and the difference was more pronounced in the units that were washed prior to infusion (Tables 1 and 2). Total cell viability was low (mean value, 42.6%), but this was mainly due to neutrophils. Regarding CD34+ cells, there was a significant difference between absolute counts at cryopreservation and at thaw (p<10-4). Despite reduction postthaw, the counts of both TNC and CD34+ cells did correlate with the corresponding values at cryopreservation by Spearman’s analysis. Of note, washing seemed slightly advantageous in terms of CD34+ recovery (Tables 1 and 2). CD34+ cells retained high viability after thaw, with 90% of CBUs (44 out of 49 tested) demonstrating CD34+ viability 80%. Viability of <50% was noticed in only one CBU that failed to engraft. In conclusion, CB cellular content and especially the CD34+ cell count is frequently shown to be inferior at thaw compared to cryopreservation. This probably reflects both the lack of standardization of CD34+ cell measurement and the effect of thawing procedure. Therefore, CD34+ cell viability may be a more meaningful marker for determining CBU quality. GVH/GVL
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".