Numerical Simulation of a Novel Jet-Impingement Micro Heat Sink With Cross Flow Under Non Uniform Heating Condition
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A novel micro heat sink applying the jet-impingement and cross flow is proposed to dissipate the heat from the electrical devices. Six hotspots of 2 mm × 2 mm are positioned on a flat plate of 25.4 mm × 25.4 mm. The area of flat plate except the hotspots is provided a constant heat flux of 20 W/cm2 as background heating source among cases. Four heat fluxes from 40 to 100 W/cm2 on the hotspots are tested to simulate the different operation conditions. The cross flow is used to remove the background heat flux and jet flow is supplied into the swirl microchannel, located at the right top of hotspot, to dissipate the large heat flux from hotspots. The channel depth is 0.5 mm and the width of swirl microchannel is 0.38 mm. The cross flow and jet flow velocity vary from 0.1 m/s to 0.5 m/s and from 0.5 m/s to 2 m/s, respectively. The effects of cross flow and jet flow on the cooling performance are investigated by numerical simulation. The local heat transfer coefficient and Nusselt number are calculated to evaluate the cooling performance of proposed micro heat sink for the targets of low maximum temperature, temperature gradient and pressure drop. The results show that the maximum temperature of the proposed design occurred at the outlet is approximately 65 °C among tested cases. The corresponding pressure drop is 5.5 kPa. The overall thermal resistance reaches as small as 0.23 K/W.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".