MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069535530 · doi:10.1115/2001-gt-0024

Industrial Trent Dry Low Emissions Gas Fuel Control System

2001· article· en· W2069535530 on OpenAlexaff
Jeff Gessaman, Andreas Goetz

Bibliographic record

VenueVolume 4: Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy; Ceramics; Structures and Dynamics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; IGTI Scholar Award · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFlow Measurement and Analysis
Canadian institutionsRolls-Royce (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetering modeAutomotive engineeringControl valvesFlow measurementEngineeringFlow (mathematics)Body orificeEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Regulations are requiring that the emissions from land-based gas turbines be tightly controlled. To limit emissions, the Industrial Trent turbine controls flame temperature through a premixed multi-stage combustor. This requires a multi-path fuel delivery system that provides accurate and repeatable metering of the fuel. There are also requirements that the fuel system quickly stop the flow of fuel and vent appropriate lines in the case of a load rejection or an emergency shutdown. The gas system is a four-path fuel metering system that incorporates shutoff and vent capabilities in addition to high accuracy multi-path flow metering. One of the fuel paths is dedicated to the ignition torch and is significantly smaller and flow accuracies are less demanding than for the three main metering legs. The concentration of work was dedicated to providing highly accurate and repeatable flow metering for the three main fuel legs. There was also a drive to minimize cost and provide commonality of parts between each of the three legs. Current fuel schedules require metering through a 20:1 turn down ratio. Flow through each metering leg is measured in the same manner as flow measurement is performed across an orifice flow meter. The metering valve is a primary element for which the flow characteristics are well known under a large number of valve positions and flow conditions. Analysis and testing has been conducted to define flow accuracy and repeatability. Further work has been conducted to minimize pressure drop across the system and to reduce the number of sensors required.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.058
Threshold uncertainty score0.195

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0580.021

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.202
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueVolume 4: Manufacturing Materials and Metallurgy; Ceramics; Structures and Dynamics; Controls, Diagnostics and Instrumentation; Education; IGTI Scholar AwardSame topicFlow Measurement and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207