1946 – Profile Of Care At a Medical School Emergency Department In 2001 And 2011 Related To Drugs Use And Abuse - Marilia/ Sp Brazil
Bibliographic record
Abstract
There is a significant increase in the use of multiple drugs. The use and abuse is a current and alarming phenomenon. The use of this substance is a challenge to public health. Objectives To describe the epidemiology and clinical care of the emergency department by use of licit and illicit drugs in 2001 and 2011. Compare if there was a change in profile over the past 10 years. Methodology Epidemiological descriptive study. We analyzed 1982 medical records in 2001 and 2465 in 2011. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee. Results Regarding sex, remained unchanged; the male is responsible for most of the medical care. Regarding age, there was no change over the last ten years, being individuals between 20-39 years old the highest rate of attendance. As the etiologic profile, there has been a change over the last 10 years. In 2001 the diagnosis of ICD-10-F10 (Mental and behavioral disorders due to use of alcohol) was predominant. In 2011 the ICD-10 and ICD-10-F19 (mental disorder and behavior due to multiple drug use and use of other psychoactive substances). As for the number of attendances, in 2001 there was a large concentration in the first quarter, while in 2011 it was better distributed throughout the year. There was an increase in the number of visits in 2011 compared to 2001. Conclusion We believe educational and preventive actions are necessary to minimize the increase in drug use. It is also necessary to have measures to reduce damage.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".