Endoscopic Treatment of Zenker Diverticulum: Results of a 7-Year Experience
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Zenker diverticulum (ZD) is a rare disease usually seen in elderly patients who present with symptoms of worsening dysphagia and regurgitation. Although open surgical approach is still the standard management for symptomatic patients, the endoscopic technique has evolved as an alternative approach, especially for highly morbid patients. We are reporting our experience for treating ZD using endoscopic needle-knife papillotome. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 18 patients with a mean age of 80 years (range 68 to 91 years) were included in our prospective cohort study. All patients underwent endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy for symptomatic ZD using needle-knife papillotome at Brandon Regional Health Centre during a 7-year period. Mean follow-up was 27.5 months. A dysphagia score system from 0 (no dysphagia) to 4 (severe dysphagia) was used. All patients' baseline characteristics, pre- and postoperative symptoms, operative time, time to oral intake, length of hospital stay, recurrence of symptoms, and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Dysphagia score and regurgitation symptoms improved substantially after treatment. Mean operative time was 28.4 minutes. Oral intake was resumed within 24 hours in all but 1 patient. Hospital stay for the majority was 24 to 48 hours. Only 1 patient had a microperforation treated conservatively and 2 patients had re-do procedures for persistence of dysphagia. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopic cricopharyngeal myotomy using needle-knife papillotome is an effective approach to manage ZD for highly morbid patients. It is minimally invasive, decreases anesthetic time, shortens hospital stay, and has a low complication rate.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".