MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069707687 · doi:10.1243/0954406001523146

Fast and accurate inclusion of steam properties in two- and three-dimensional steam turbine flow calculations

2000· article· en· W2069707687 on OpenAlexaff
Philip G. Hill, Kiyoshi Miyagawa, J. D. Denton

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering Science · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTurbomachinery Performance and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetastabilitySubcoolingCondensationThermodynamicsShock (circulatory)MechanicsThermodynamic equilibriumSuperheated steamTurbineSteam turbineMaterials scienceBoilingChemistryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Denton time-marching method for turbomachinery flow calculation has been modified for rapid and accurate access to the properties of steam in equilibrium dry and wet states and in the metastable dry region. Transition between metastable dry and equilibrium wet states is accomplished either at the stable equilibrium boundary or by allowing metastable equilibrium expansion followed by a condensation shock whose location depends on the local degree of subcooling of the metastable vapour and the local expansion rate. Steam properties and their derivatives are obtained from a wide-ranging Helmholtz representation of equilibrium (stable and metastable) thermodynamic properties and stored for use in an accurate Taylor series representation. Comparisons have been made of flow development in a low-pressure steam turbine blade row for three expansion assumptions: equilibrium stable and metastable dry, stable equilibrium, dry and wet, and dry expansion prior to a condensation ‘shock’ which is followed by equilibrium wet expansion. Inclusion of real steam properties extends calculation time for one iteration cycle by about 5 per cent and has little effect on the number of cycles required for convergence in the absence of a condensation shock; however, inclusion of the shock may double the time required for convergence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part C Journal of Mechanical Engineering ScienceSame topicTurbomachinery Performance and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207