The Study of Devitrification Processes in Heavy‐Metal Fluoride Glasses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Heavy-metal fluoride glasses are very promising optical fiber materials because of their predicted ultralow loss and long transparency range. Although conventional silica fibers have attained their theoretical minimum loss of 0.15 dB/km, fluoride glasses have the potential to yield losses of only 0.001 dB/km. Fluoride glasses also exhibit transparency into mid-IR frequencies, a region inaccessible to silica fibers. However, this group of glasses is very unstable to devitrification during both bulk glass synthesis and fiber-drawing. This instability has limited their commercial exploitation to a small niche market in the laser industry. The ZBLAN glass (53ZrF(4)-20BaF(2)-4LaF(3)-3AlF(3)-20NaF) is the most promising of these materials since its fiber-drawing region lies on the edge, or possibly just outside its crystallization region. It is believed that additional research into understanding the nucleation mechanics involved in the devitrification of fluoride glasses will lead to the development of technology to suppress such nucleation, or at least minimize the associated crystallization temperature region, allowing high optical quality fibers to be produced. It has recently been demonstrated that a microgravity environment can suppress devitrification in ZBLAN glass preform preparation, and that devitrification may be reduced when preparing ZBLAN terrestrially in a containerless facility. It is believed that the role of viscosity is critical in the devitrification mechanism of ZBLAN glass and in determining the optimum fiber-drawing temperature. Unfortunately, viscosity data for fluoride glasses are only available above the melting point and around the glass transition. A piezoelectric viscometer has been developed and is being used to determine the missing viscosity data in the fiber-drawing and crystallization temperature regions. Shear thinning of the glasses and/or the application of hydrostatic pressure on the glasses have been recently proposed to be responsible for devitrification during fiber-drawing at 1 g and in reduced gravity. The study we report here is to explore the extent to which such a proposal is realistic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".