Designing the “Self—Concept of Creative Self-Development” of Students during the Training Process in Pedagogics
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Actuality of the matter under investigation is stipulated by the necessity of exploring the issues of development of “Self-concept of creative self-development” of students, which can be defined not only as the “Theory of Self” or as the effect of realization of one’s own “Self”, but also as the regulation mechanism of all types of creative activity of a human being. The purpose of this article is to analyze and systemize pedagogical conditions of effective development of the “Self-concept of Creative Self-development” of students. The method leading to the research of this issue was a pedagogical experiment on testing pedagogical conditions of effective development of the “Self-concept of Creative Self-development” of students during the study of “Pedagogics” as an educational discipline. The main result of this article is the conclusion that application of the system of creative, research related tasks targeted to the development of the “Self-concept of Creative Self-development” of students, leads to significant growth of all the backbone elements of “selfness”. The experiment confirmed the effectiveness of designing the “Self-concept of Creative Self-development” of students through the training process (on the basis of the pedagogical disciplines’ training material) based on the integration of the pedagogical conditions: system of diagnostics and self-diagnostics of “self” processes, enrichment of training sessions on pedagogical disciplines with the specialized tasks on stimulating reflexive thinking, aimed at self-actualization of one’s own creative development processes, assistance to students in realizing indicators and criteria of principle backbone elements of creative development, periodical self-correction of the “Self-concept of Creative Self-development”; implementation of the education and training integration links. Information in this article may be useful for educators of higher education institutions, involved in generating the “Self-concept of Creative Self-development” of students in the framework of professional education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".