The Relation of Body Fats, Anthropometric Factor and Physiological Functions of Iranian Female National Judo Team
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Both the IJF (International Judo Federation) and the IOC (International Olympic Committee) regulations require athletes to compete in set weight categories. Competitors are matched by weight divisions, thus players demonstrate relatively low levels of body fat with a high strength to mass ratio, and therefore the purpose of this study was to investigate the relation of body fats, anthropometric factors and physiological functions of Iranian female national judo players. The participants of this study were eight players of Iranian Judo national team (age, 22.5± 2.4yr; weight, 66.01± 6.4kg; height, 165± 6.6cm). The physiological profile was composed of aerobic (maximal test) and anaerobic power (ergo amp test). For anthropometric and body composition profiles, height, weights, body fat percentage, body mass index (BMI), waist hip ratio (WHR) were measured. Correlations were found between weight and body fat percentage and WHR. However negative correlation was found between aerobic and anaerobic power. Also positive correlation was found between BMI and lean body mass. Finding has showed judo players in this study, were almost favorite in terms of aerobics power and weight. The judo players who presenting higher aerobic power present a better performance in high-intensity intermittent activities; judo players with larger circumferences present higher absolute maximal strength, but this relation was not significant when strength was expressed relative to body weight. While these variables do not necessarily predict performance in a sport where technique and tactics are essential elements for success, they may provide some goals for developing judo players.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".