Structural Constraints in the Design of Silver Sulfonate Coordination Networks: Three New Polysulfonate Open Frameworks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Three new silver sulfonate metal-organic frameworks are presented along with a design strategy for future generations. [[Ag6(mesitylenetrisulfonate)2(H2O)5].2H2O]infinity (1), [Ag4(durenetetrasulfonate)(H2O)2](infinity) (2), and [[Ag4(1,3,5,7-tetrakis(4,4'-sulfophenyl)adamantane)(H2O)2].1.3H2O]infinity (3) represent a series of open-framework silver sulfonate solids where the organic linker plays a key role in determining the overall structure. Compound 1 forms a pillared layered structure, while compounds 2 and 3 form 3-D nets derived from cross-linking of 1-D columns of silver sulfonates. All three solids incorporate water molecules, which can be removed to yield a solid stable to in excess of 300 degrees C. Powder X-ray diffraction studies and vapor sorption experiments show, for 1 and 2, that the solids retain their structure when guests are removed and, for all three, that water vapor is resorbed stoichiometrically by the solids. An idealized silver sulfonate framework is proposed, and upon comparison to the reported structures, guidelines are proposed for structural constraints in the design of future generations of 1-D and possibly 0-D aggregate structures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".