MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069852218 · doi:10.1115/ht-fed2004-56179

Effect of Impact Velocity and Substrate Temperature on Boiling of Water Droplets Impinging on a Hot Stainless Steel Surface

2004· article· en· W2069852218 on OpenAlexaff
N. Z. Mehdizadeh, S. Chandra

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFluid Dynamics and Heat Transfer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSuperheatingMaterials scienceBubbleBoilingSubstrate (aquarium)NucleationFlywheelComposite materialMechanicsChemistryThermodynamicsMechanical engineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We photographed high velocity impact of small water droplets (0.55 mm) on a heated stainless steel surface. To achieve high impact velocities the test surface was mounted on the rim of a rotating flywheel, giving linear velocities of up to 50 m/s. Two cartridge heaters were inserted in the substrate and used to vary substrate temperature. A CCD video camera was used to photograph droplets impinging on the substrate. By synchronizing the ejection of a single droplet with the position of the rotating flywheel and triggering of the camera, different stages of droplet impact were photographed. Substrate temperature was varied from 100–240°C and the impact velocity from 10–30 m/s. High-resolution photographs were taken of vapor bubbles nucleating sites inside the thin films produced by spreading droplets. For a given impact velocity, the extent of droplet spreading increased with substrate temperature. The superheat needed to initiate bubble nucleation decreased with impact velocity. We derived an analytical expression for the amount of superheat required for vapor bubble nucleation as a function of impact velocity.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.325
Threshold uncertainty score0.496

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.218
Teacher spread0.214 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2004
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicFluid Dynamics and Heat TransferFrench-language works237,207