HISS, not insulin, causes vasodilation in response to administered insulin
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Meal-induced sensitization to the dynamic actions of insulin results from the peripheral actions of a hormone released by the liver (hepatic insulin sensitizing substance or HISS). Absence of meal-induced insulin sensitization results in the pathologies associated with cardiometabolic risk. Using three protocols that have previously demonstrated HISS metabolic action, we tested the hypothesis that HISS accounts for the vasodilation that has been associated with insulin. The dynamic metabolic actions of insulin and HISS were determined using a euglycemic clamp in response to a bolus of 100 mU/kg insulin in pentobarbital-anesthetized Sprague-Dawley rats. Hindlimb blood flow was measured with an ultrasound flow probe on the aorta above the bifurcation of the iliac arteries. Fed rats showed tightly coupled metabolic and vascular responses, which were completed by 35 min after insulin administration. Blocking HISS release, with the use of atropine or hepatic surgical denervation, eliminated the HISS-dependent metabolic and vascular responses to insulin administration. Physiological suppression of HISS release occurs with fasting. In 24-h fasted rats, HISS metabolic and vascular actions were absent, and atropine had no effect on either action. Fed rats with liver denervation did not release HISS, but intraportal venous infusion of acetylcholine, to mimic the permissive parasympathetic nerve signal, restored the ability of insulin to cause HISS release and restored both the metabolic and vascular actions. These studies report vascular actions of HISS for the first time and demonstrate that HISS, not insulin action, results in the peripheral vasodilation generally attributed to insulin.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".