MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069972126 · doi:10.1667/rr13450.1

The Relative Contributions of DNA Strand Breaks, Base Damage and Clustered Lesions to the Loss of DNA Functionality Induced by Ionizing Radiation

2014· article· en· W2069972126 on OpenAlexaff
Saloua Kouass Sahbani, Sonia Girouard, Pierre Cloutier, Léon Sanche, Darel J. Hunting

Bibliographic record

VenueRadiation Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicDNA Repair Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIonizing radiationDNA damagePlasmidDNATransformation (genetics)Double strandDNA repairBiologyMolecular biologyIrradiationGel electrophoresisBiophysicsChemistryGeneticsGenePhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The majority of studies on lethal radiobiological damage have focused on double-strand breaks (DSBs), a type of clustered DNA damage and the evaluation of their toxicity, while other types of clustered DNA damage have received much less attention. The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the contribution of different lesions induced by ionizing radiation to the loss of plasmid DNA functionality. We employed a simple model system comprising E. coli transformed with an irradiated plasmid [pGEM-3Zf (-)] to determine the effect of DSBs and other lesions including base damage and clustered lesions on the functionality ("viability") of the plasmid. The yields of γ-radiation-induced single-strand breaks (SSBs) and DSBs were measured by gel electrophoresis. We found that the transformation efficiency decreases with radiation dose, but this decrease cannot be explained by the formation of DSBs. For example, at doses of 500 and 700 Gy, the relative transformation efficiency falls from 100% to 53% and 26%, respectively, while only 5.7% and 9.1% of the plasmids contain a DSB. In addition, it is also unlikely that randomly distributed base lesions could explain the loss of functionality of the plasmid, since cells can repair them efficiently. However, clustered lesions other than DSBs, which are difficult to repair and result in the loss of information on both DNA strands, have the potential to induce the loss of plasmid functionality. We therefore measured the yields of γ-radiation-induced base lesions and cluster damage, which are respectively converted into SSBs and DSBs by the base excision repair enzymes endonuclease III (Nth) and formamidopyrimidine-DNA glycosylase (Fpg). Our data demonstrate that the yield of cluster damage (i.e., lesions that yield DSBs following digestion) is 31 times higher than that of frank DSBs. This finding suggests that frank DSBs make a relatively minor contribution to the loss of DNA functionality induced by ionizing radiation, while other toxic lesions formed at a much higher frequencies than DSBs must be responsible for the loss of plasmid functionality. These lesions may be clustered lesions/locally multiply damaged sites (LMDS), including base damage, SSBs and/or intrastrand and interstrand crosslinks, leading to the loss of vital information in the DNA. Using a mathematical model, we estimate that at least three toxic lesions are required for the inactivation of plasmid functionality, in part because even these complex lesions can be repaired.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.045
Threshold uncertainty score0.326

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.328
Teacher spread0.300 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRadiation ResearchSame topicDNA Repair MechanismsFrench-language works237,207