Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms Affect One-Third of Men in a Prostate Cancer Screening Population
Bibliographic record
Abstract
PURPOSE: Lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) are common in elderly men. Radical prostatectomy may relieve obstructive symptoms, whereas radiation therapy may exacerbate obstructive or irritative symptoms. Baseline LUTS rates are unknown in populations screened for prostate cancer (PCa). Thus, it is difficult to determine the changes in LUTS that can be attributed to PCa treatment. Therefore, we assessed baseline rates of LUTS in a PCa screening cohort and assessed which of the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) symptoms had the most detrimental effect on quality of life (QoL). METHODS: The IPSS was completed by 1273 men without clinical evidence of PCa who participated in an annual PCa screening event. Presence of irritative or obstructive symptoms was considered when they were reported at least two of five times. Using linear regression analyses, we evaluated the effect of each questionnaire symptom on the IPSS QoL domain. RESULTS: Mean age was 57.6 years (range 40-89 years). Of all in the cohort, 40% (n = 472) reported moderate to severe LUTS (IPSS score > or =8), and 21% (n = 255) were mostly dissatisfied with this condition. Irritative symptoms were reported by 39% (n = 495) and obstructive symptoms by 37%. Of all IPSS symptoms, urinary straining was associated with the least favorable QoL, followed by urinary frequency. CONCLUSION: More than one-third of persons at risk of PCa are affected by either irritative or obstructive symptoms, and one in five of these men is bothered by LUTS. Because PCa treatment may exacerbate LUTS, the severity and impact on QoL should be considered carefully before diagnosis and/or treatment.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".