DELAYED IMPLANTATION OF INTRAMEDULLARY CHITOSAN CHANNELS CONTAINING NERVE GRAFTS PROMOTES EXTENSIVE AXONAL REGENERATION AFTER SPINAL CORD INJURY
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: We describe a new strategy to promote axonal regeneration after subacute or chronic spinal cord injury consisting of intramedullary implantation of chitosan guidance channels containing peripheral nerve (PN) grafts. METHODS: Chitosan channels filled with PN grafts harvested from green fluorescent protein rats were implanted in the cavity 1 week (subacute) or 4 weeks (chronic) after 50-g clip injury at T8 and were compared with similarly injured animals implanted with either unfilled channels or no channels. Functional recovery was measured weekly for 12 weeks by open-field locomotion, after which histological examination was performed. RESULTS: The implanted channels with PN grafts contained a thick tissue bridge containing as many as 35,000 myelinated axons in both the subacute and chronic spinal cord injury groups, with the greatest number of axons in the channels containing PN grafts implanted subacutely. There were numerous green fluorescent protein-positive donor Schwann cells in the tissue bridges in all animals with PN grafts. Moreover, these Schwann cells had high functional capacity in terms of myelination of the axons in the channels. In addition, PN-filled chitosan channels showed excellent biocompatibility with the adjacent neural tissue and no obvious signs of degradation and minimal tissue reaction at 14 weeks after implantation. In control animals that had unfilled chitosan channels implanted, there was minimal axonal regeneration in the channels; in control animals without channels, there were large cavities in the spinal cords, and the bridges contained only a small number of axons and Schwann cells. Despite the large numbers of axons in the chitosan channel-PN graft group, there was no significant difference in functional recovery between treatment and control groups. CONCLUSION: Intramedullary implantation of chitosan guidance channels containing PN grafts in the cavity after subacute spinal cord injury resulted in a thicker bridge containing a larger number of myelinated axons compared with chitosan channels alone. A chitosan channel containing PN grafts is a promising strategy for spinal cord repair.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".