MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2069987806 · doi:10.1139/p01-151

The impact of the OSIRIS grating efficiency on radiance and trace-gas retrievals

2002· article· en· W2069987806 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
C. A. McLinden, J. C. McConnell, Kimberly Strong, I. C. McDade, R. L. Gattinger, Robert A. King, B. H. Solheim, E. J. Llewellyn, W. Evans

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicAtmospheric Ozone and Climate
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaCanadian Space Agency
KeywordsRadianceGratingDifferential optical absorption spectroscopyTrace gasPhysicsRadiative transferOpticsPolarization (electrochemistry)OsirisSpectrographSpectral lineRemote sensingAbsorption (acoustics)Astronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The optical spectrograph and infrared imaging system (OSIRIS), launched in 2001, is a UV–visible diffraction-grating instrument designed to measure light scattered from the Earth's limb. Laboratory measurements of the OSIRIS diffraction-grating efficiency reveal a sensitivity to polarization including an anomalous structure of width 20–30 nm introduced into light polarized in a direction perpendicular to the grooves of the grating. A vector radiative-transfer model was used to generate synthetic OSIRIS spectra in an effort to examine the effect of this on radiances and trace-gas retrievals. Radiances that included grating effects were found to deviate by nearly 10% from those that did not and also contained the anomalous structure. Performing differential optical absorption spectroscopy (DOAS) on these spectra revealed errors in ozone apparent column densities of up to 80 DU. The size of the error was controlled mainly by the difference in polarization between the two DOAS spectra. Two possible correction methods were investigated. The first was to remove the grating effects by applying a correction factor to the raw radiances calculated using the vector radiative-transfer model. The second was to include the efficiency coefficient spectra in the DOAS fit. PACS Nos.: 42.68Mj, 98.55Qf

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.322
Threshold uncertainty score0.801

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2002
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicAtmospheric Ozone and ClimateFrench-language works237,207