Poly(butyl methacrylate‐<i>co</i>‐methacrylic acid) tissue engineering scaffold with pro‐angiogenic potential <i>in vivo</i>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A poly(butyl methacrylate-co-methacrylic acid) (BMA-MAA) scaffold was fabricated by an in situ polymerization solvent casting/particulate leaching technique. It displayed high porosity (85-90%), pore interconnectivity, and a pore size range of 100-650 microm. Compression testing of the scaffolds demonstrated a dependence of the compressive stiffness on several fabrication variables including the ratio of monomer to salt used during the polymerization, the degree of salt fusion, and the choice of alternative comonomers to BMA. Subcutaneous implantation of BMA-MAA scaffolds in mice revealed an increased level of histological angiogenesis in tissue invading the pores of the scaffold compared to a BMA control, consistent with the prediction that methacrylic acid (MAA) containing copolymer beads are angiogenic in a wound healing context. At postoperative day 21, the capillary density in the BMA-MAA scaffolds was 56 +/- 13/mm(2) as compared to 32 +/- 8/mm(2) for the BMA scaffolds. With further investigation, it is expected that this biomaterial capable of eliciting an angiogenic response will have widespread application in tissue engineering.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".