MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070045006 · doi:10.1002/jcb.20365

Chromatin modification of the human imprinted <i>NDN</i> (necdin) gene detected by in vivo footprinting

2005· article· en· W2070045006 on OpenAlexaff
Meredith L. Hanel, Jason C.Y. Lau, Isabelle Paradis, Régen Drouin, Rachel Wevrick

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Cellular Biochemistry · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGenetic Syndromes and Imprinting
Canadian institutionsUniversité de SherbrookeUniversity of Alberta
FundersEunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
KeywordsGenomic imprintingChromatinEpigeneticsBiologyGeneAlleleFootprintingGeneticsImprinting (psychology)DNA methylationTranscription (linguistics)Chromosome conformation captureMolecular biologyTranscription factorGene expressionEnhancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Allele-specific transcription is a characteristic feature of imprinted genes. Many imprinted genes are also transcribed in a tissue- or cell type-specific manner. Overlapping epigenetic signals must, therefore, modulate allele-specific and tissue-specific expression at imprinted loci. In addition, long-range interactions with an Imprinting Center (IC) may influence transcription, in an allele-specific or cell-type specific manner. The IC on human chromosome 15q11 controls parent-of-origin specific allelic identity of a set of genes located in cis configuration within 2 Mb. We have now examined the chromatin accessibility of the promoter region of one of the Imprinting Centre-controlled genes, NDN encoding necdin, using in vivo DNA footprinting to identify sites of DNA-protein interaction and altered chromatin configuration. We identified sites of modified chromatin that mark the parental alleles in NDN-expressing cells, and in cells in which NDN is not expressed. Our results suggest that long-lasting allele-specific marks and more labile tissue-specific marks layer epigenetic information that can be discriminated using DNA footprinting methodologies. Sites of modified chromatin mark the parental alleles in NDN-expressing cells, and in cells in which NDN is not expressed. Our results suggest that a layering of epigenetic information controls allele- and tissue-specific gene expression of this imprinted gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.562

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Cellular BiochemistrySame topicGenetic Syndromes and ImprintingFrench-language works237,207