Continuity of Care and Health Decline Associated With a Hip Fracture
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: Identify determinants of health decline associated with hip fracture with the goal of designing interventions. METHOD: Prefracture and postfracture information was obtained from participants aged 65-plus years fracturing a hip between July 1996 and August 1997. Health utilization data were linked to the cohort data and to an age-gender matched cohort of nonfracture seniors. RESULTS: Fracture patients were likely to have been hospitalized and have low continuity of care. Patients making frequent physician visits were at increased risk of both prefracture hospitalization and postfracture health decline. Prefracture hospitalization was less likely for patients with high physical function; patients of high mental status were less likely to experience postfracture health decline. DISCUSSION: Health appears to be in decline prefracture. Patients may benefit from continuous physician care to prevent further health deterioration. Some hip fractures can be prevented by identifying high-risk seniors at an early stage and intervening to prevent falls.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".