Upper gastrointestinal findings and detection of <i>Helicobacter pylori</i> in patients with oral lichen planus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Lichen planus (LP) is a mucocutaneous disease of unknown aetiology, which may involve the gastrointestinal (GI) mucosa. The association of Helicobacter pylori with LP has been a subject of debate. AIM: To investigate upper GI findings and the presence of H. pylori in GI mucosa and oral LP (OLP). METHODS: Oral biopsies from 20 patients with erosive OLP and 20 with non-erosive OLP were investigated for the presence of H. pylori by histopathological examination and PCR. Upper GI endoscopy and GI mucosal biopsies were examined for LP lesions and/or H. pylori. RESULTS: The endoscopic findings of both groups were oesophagitis, antral gastritis and duodenitis. No LP or LP-like changes were found in the upper GI mucosa. H. pylori was found by histopathological examination in the gastric mucosa of 18 patients (45%), with equal distribution in both the control and study groups. Positive PCR results were obtained from biopsy specimens of oral lesions in all patients with erosive OLP and presence of H. pylori in the stomach (9 patients), but in none of the patients with non-erosive OLP (P = 0.001). CONCLUSION: We did not find any difference in symptoms, endoscopic findings and histopathological results between patients with erosive and non-erosive OLP. However, the concomitant presence of erosive OLP, of H. pylori nucleic acid in erosive OLP and the H. pylori organisms in gastric mucosa implies a possible pathogenic connection between this bacterium and erosive OLP.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".