Cardiovascular Safety of Cocaine Anaesthesia in the Presence of Adrenaline during Septal Surgery
Bibliographic record
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the possible cardiovascular side effects of 4% cocaine solution in the presence of adrenaline during septal surgery. METHOD: Sixty adult patients undergoing elective septal surgery with local anaesthesia were included in the study. Noses were packed with 5-mL 4% cocaine (200-mg) solution on cotton pledgets, which were left in the nose for 15 minutes. Then, 10 mL of local anaesthetic (lidocaine 2% and adrenaline 1:100,000) were infiltrated in septal mucosa, and 15 minutes later, the surgical procedure was initiated. At the beginning of the operation, intervals from 12-lead surface electrocardiograms and vital signs including blood pressures and heart rate were recorded as a baseline. All measurements were repeated just before local anaesthetic infiltration, just before the beginning of the surgical procedure, and, finally, at the end of the operation. All four measurements and electrocardiographic tracings were examined. Systolic and diastolic blood pressures and QT parameters, RR intervals, and heart rates obtained from electrocardiogram were compared statistically with repeated-measures analysis of variance. RESULTS: No statistically significant difference was found among all four staged measurements. None of the patients developed tachycardia, hypertension, hypotension, or any chest pain. In electrocardiogram tracings, no sinus tachycardia depression, elevation, or bundle branch block was noted. CONCLUSION: This study shows that concomitant use of cocaine and adrenaline in the proper concentration and volume and in a carefully screened patient group was safe for the cardiovascular system.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".