Ultrastructural and cytochemical study of cell wall modification by lactoferrin, lactoferricin and penicillin G against Staphylococcus aureus
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To investigate the effect of lactoferrin or lactoferricin with or without penicillin G, light and transmission electron microscopy were performed on thin sections of two Staphylococcus aureus strains. Lactoferrin affected the ultrastructure of S. aureus and groups of undivided cells were observed after lactoferrin treatment with or without penicillin G. These results suggest that lactoferrin can affect staphylococcal cell separation and therefore prevent dissemination of daughter cells from spreading infection. After treatment with lactoferrin, S. aureus cells were less covered (P<0.05) with wheatgerm agglutinin labelled with gold, thus suggesting that lactoferrin affected the synthesis of peptidoglycan and/or the binding to N-acetyl-beta-D-glucosamine. Lactoferricin with or without penicillin G induced the lysis of many bacteria, formation of mesosomal structures and modifications of cell wall. Lactating female CD-1 mice were infected by intramammary delivery of a penicillin-resistant S. aureus strain and were then randomly assigned to treatments according to a 2 x 2 factorial design. Electron microscopy examination showed that 2 days of systemic treatments with lactoferrin affected the morphology and aggregation of S. aureus. In conclusion, lactoferrin and lactoferricin affect S. aureus morphology which may facilitate its killing by penicillin G.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".