MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070196634 · doi:10.4043/25797-ms

Critical HP/HT Flowline Design Challenges Associated With Deepwater Miocene GoM Fields

2015· article· en· W2070196634 on OpenAlexaff
Tor Gavem, Amitabh Kumar, Vijaykumar Panga, Mike Stratton, Jason J. Harry

Bibliographic record

VenueOffshore Technology Conference · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOffshore Engineering and Technologies
Canadian institutionsIntecsea (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubseaPerforationPetroleum engineeringMarine engineeringGeologyEnvironmental scienceEngineeringMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract High Pressure / High Temperature (HP/HT) design of a flowline system has become a common design challenge as the quest to extract hydrocarbons has pushed the industry to exploit deeper reservoirs. In recent years, industry has classified systems over ~10,000 psi and over ~300°F as XHPHT (Extra HP/HT). As subsea technology continues to develop, it may not be farfetched to be soon considering UHPHT (Ultra HP/HT) flowline designs. This paper addresses the key features and challenges of the HP/HT design as applied to the production flowlines of a deepwater Miocene GoM (Gulf of Mexico) field. The dual production flowlines are each ~10 miles long with SITP (Shut-In Tubing Pressure) of ~15000-psi and maximum design temperature of ~300°F (classified as XHPHT). HP/HT specific design challenges are associated with large expansion, global buckling, axial creep, and low-cycle fatigue, which are directly influenced by the flowline length. Even though the tie-back distance to the host is relatively long, the definition of "short" and "long" flowline/pipeline loses its significance due to distributed responses (both "Natural" and "Engineered") of system. Additionally, due to field-specific fluid properties, excessive pressure drops across the well perforation and / or the subsea choke can cause Joule-Thomson heating effects, which must be accounted for in design. This paper further discusses optimization of various design components in order to accommodate small variations in the input parameters (soil, operational transients, installation tolerances etc.) that are crucial with respect to global and local responses. This case study uses mitigation techniques at pre-determined locations to address the design concerns such as large expansions, rogue (uncontrolled) buckles, axial creep ("walking"), and low-cycle fatigue. By exercising careful review of the iterative assessments and subsequent optimization of the system's overall design, a safe and reliable solution is achieved. HP/HT design philosophy for deepwater Miocene GOM fields form an integral part of design / implementation processes in the field development program and have significant influence on the overall subsea architecture, procurement and construction strategy, operating philosophy, and integrity management plan. Finally, the paper shows a comparison of numerical prediction and the data acquired from the field observations. The predicted system response is in good agreement with the field observations, thereby, validating the overall assessment/modeling approach and confirming the robustness of the system's response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.676
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOffshore Technology ConferenceSame topicOffshore Engineering and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207