Deposition of Particles by a Confined Impinging Jet onto a Flat Surface at Re<b>=</b>10<sup><b>4</b></sup>
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
An axisymmetric turbulent air jet flow (with vertical and downward orientation) laden with fluorescent solid particles was impinged normally onto a flat surface.The particle deposition efficiency and distribution on the flat surface were measured experimentally using fluorometry and imaging techniques.The fluorescent particles (5.0 m diameter) were dispersed by a nebulizer and injected in a stream of compressed air, resulting in a steady flow (Q = 111 L/min).A round nozzle was used to generate a jet characterized by a Reynolds number of Re = 10 4 , based on the nozzle diameter (D = 15.0 mm) and nozzle exit velocity (u = 10.5 m/s).Three dimensionless distances from the nozzle's exit to the impaction surface, L/D = 2, 4, and 6, were investigated.It was observed that although having similar total deposition efficiencies (16.5-17.8%),shorter nozzle to surface distances (L/D = 2 and 4) show a more pronounced ring-like radial deposition pattern around the stagnation point.These shorter distances also exhibit significantly lower particle deposition near the stagnation point when compared to the longer distance (L/D = 6).Indeed, in moving through L/D = 2, 4, and 6, peak deposition density values of 254, 347, and 685 particles/mm 2 shift through radii of 2.1 D, 0.8 D, and 0.1 D, respectively.In addition to the experiments, numerical simulation was also performed, which showed that the particle deposition was dominated by a turbulent dispersion mechanism for L/D = 2, with inertial impaction becoming more important for the L/D = 4 and 6 cases.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it