MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070350434 · doi:10.1088/0143-0807/22/2/701

Rutherford - Scientist Supreme

2000· article· en· W2070350434 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Helmut Rechenberg

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Journal of Physics · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicTwentieth Century Scientific Developments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsNuclear physicsLawPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This new book dealing with the life of Ernest Rutherford has been written and compiled by a New Zealander, enthusiastic about both his country and the outstanding pioneer of radioactivity and nuclear physics, who was indeed one of the greatest physicists of all time (although he obtained the chemistry Nobel Prize in 1908). The author has searched most carefully for all possible traces of his hero, especially in the country of his birth, bringing together detailed reminiscences of surviving witnesses and their descendants and has collected together photos and pictures of the family, friends, teachers, buildings, places and towns and landscapes where Ernest grew up. He has thus also created something like a history of New Zealand and the life of British settlers in the second half of the 19th century. We have to be very grateful to Campbell for telling us these details of the tough conditions under which the later star of physics grew up, and we forgive him that his heart was less concerned with the later times, where Rutherford became the man we know, as these periods of his career in England, Canada and again England are far better known (from other biographies) than the early life in New Zealand. The book has been produced, designed and illustrated very well. It deserves a place of honour on the bookshelves of every physicist, especially physics teachers. Furthermore, the author gives quite reasonable accounts of the main scientific achievements of Rutherford, which can be digested even by the interested layman, and provides an excellent feeling of the greatness of his personality. Indeed, the 'Scientist Supreme' throughout his life enjoyed great popularity amongst contemporary colleagues and the admiration of the numerous collaborators (from all over the scientific world) who worked with him but despite the many honours bestowed on him he remained a straightforward and humble man.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.997
Threshold uncertainty score0.962

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.2880.198

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.204
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Journal of PhysicsSame topicTwentieth Century Scientific DevelopmentsFrench-language works237,207