Complex chromosome rearrangement and recombinant balanced translocation in a mother and a daughter with the same phenotypic abnormalities
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We report on the diagnosis of a complex chromosome rearrangement in a mother and the transmission of a simplified translocation in her fetus. The mother had mental retardation, short stature, facial dysmorphism, and hydronephrosis, but was never investigated before she was pregnant. A blood sample was taken for karyotyping at the time of amniocentesis for advanced maternal age. The mother's karyotype revealed two translocations involving chromosome 5, chromosome 16 twice, and chromosome 20 as follow: 46,XX,t(5;16;20)(5pter-->5q11.2::16q12.1-->16q23::20p11.2-->20pter;16pter-->16q12.1::5q11.2-->5qter;16qter-->16q23::20p11.2-->20qter). The amniocentesis revealed a female karyotype with an apparently balanced translocation: 46,XX,t(16;20)(q23;p11.2). The translocation of the fetus probably resulted from a meiotic recombination between the derived 5 and the normal 16 in the mother. The baby was born and presented the same facial dysmorphism and hydronephrosis. The simplification of a complex rearrangement through recombination into a balanced product has only been rarely described and it is to our knowledge the first time that both the carrier of the complex rearrangement and her descendant with a simplified rearrangement share phenotypic abnormalities.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".