Changing the Paradigm: Omegaven for the Treatment of Liver Failure in Pediatric Short Bowel Syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Parenteral omega-3 fatty acids, such as Omegaven, may benefit patients with pediatric short bowel syndrome (SBS) who develop parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease (PNALD). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospective cohort describing the outcome of all 12 children with SBS and advanced PNALD who were treated with Omegaven (target omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid ratio = 1:1 to 2:1). RESULTS: The median age was 7.5 (range 3.6-46) months, and median parenteral nutrition duration before starting Omegaven was 28.4 (range 15.3-55.3) weeks. Median initial serum conjugated bilirubin was 137 (range 54-203) micromol/L (8.06 [3.18-11.94] mg/dL). Of the 12 patients, 9 had complete and sustained resolution of hyperbilirubinemia within a median of 24 (range 7-37) weeks, and all are no longer being considered for liver transplantation. Improvements in markers of hepatic inflammation as well as nutritional status also were noted in these patients. Three patients received a liver-intestine transplant while taking Omegaven. There were no complications attributable to Omegaven. CONCLUSIONS: Omegaven is associated with restoration of liver function in patients with SBS and advanced liver disease. Parenteral omega-3 fatty acids, such as Omegaven, have the potential to fundamentally alter the paradigm of neonatal SBS from one of early death or transplantation from liver failure to a more chronic disease. More children with SBS should achieve full enteral tolerance and those who do not have the capacity for intestinal adaptation should be able to survive and receive an intestinal graft when older.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".