<title>Photosynthetic parameters in the western equatorial Pacific</title>
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Measurements of 'Photosynthesis versus Irradiance' were conducted at 9 stations along the Equator from 145 degrees East to 170 degrees West in December 1999. Samples were obtained at about from the surface and chlorophyll maximum layer. The samples were inoculated with C-13 and incubated for 3 hours in a temperature controlled linear incubator which has 8 light levels. The P-I equation of Platt et al. is employed to calculate the initial slope, Pmax and the saturation parameters. It was La-Nina condition in this period and the influence of 'cold-tongue' came over around 160 degree East. Pmax varied from 1.7 to 4.7 (gC/gChl/h) on the surface. The minimum value of Pmax on the surface was observed at 160 degree East. The value increased gradually to the east and also to the west. On the other hand, the initial slope does not change so much and we cannot see such an east-west variability as Pmax. As it has been pointed out in previous studies, Pmax and the saturation parameter tend to decrees with depth and the initial slope tends to be lower near the surface.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".