MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070423872 · doi:10.1021/pr201003g

Human ABCC1 Interacts and Colocalizes with ATP Synthase α, Revealed by Interactive Proteomics Analysis

2011· article· en· W2070423872 on OpenAlexafffund
Youyun Yang, Zhaomin Li, Wei Mo, Raghuram Ambadipudi, Randy J. Arnold, Petra Hrncirova, Miloš V. Novotný, Elias Georges, Jian‐Ting Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Proteome Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicDrug Transport and Resistance Mechanisms
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
FundersNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Cancer InstituteNational Institutes of HealthLilly EndowmentEli Lilly and Company
KeywordsABCC1ATP synthaseLinkerATP-binding cassette transporterBiologyBiochemistryProteomicsPhosphorylationCell biologyImmunoprecipitationChemistryTransporterEnzymeGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Human ABCC1 is a member of the ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporter superfamily, and its overexpression has been shown to cause multidrug resistance by active efflux of a wide variety of anticancer drugs. ABCC1 has been shown to exist and possibly function as a homodimer. However, a possible heterocomplex involving ABCC1 has been indicated. In this study, we performed an interactive proteomics study to examine proteins that bind to and form heterocomplexes with ABCC1 using coimmunoprecipitation and tandem mass spectrometry (MS/MS) analyses. We found that ATP synthase α binds to ABCC1 in plasma membranes with a ratio of 2:1. The ATP synthase α binding site in ABCC1 is located in the linker domain at the carboxyl core of ABCC1, and phosphorylation of the linker domain at the protein kinase A site enhances ATP synthase α binding. The interaction between ABCC1 and ATP synthase α in a heterocomplex may indicate a novel function of ABCC1 in regulating extracellular ATP level and purinergic signaling cascade.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.493

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.368
Teacher spread0.305 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations17
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Proteome ResearchSame topicDrug Transport and Resistance MechanismsFrench-language works237,207