MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070427055 · doi:10.1002/ibd.20562

Does the incidence of IBD increase when persons move from a low- to a high-risk area?

2008· article· en· W2070427055 on OpenAlexaff
C. N. Williams

Bibliographic record

VenueInflammatory Bowel Diseases · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicInflammatory Bowel Disease
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIncidence (geometry)MedicineEnvironmental healthPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), are much more common in the countries of Europe and North America.1,2 Over the last several decades CD has been noted in these populations to have increased even further, whereas UC has remained much the same.3 In 1997 an article from the United Kingdom described IBD as essentially being confined to Western countries.4 In North America, Americans of North European descent have more than a 4-fold increased incidence than Americans of African-American descent.1 In this population, Jews of European descent have a 5-fold increase compared to that of Caucasians. Other North American studies have shown that the incidence in Caucasians is much greater than those of African-Americans, which is greater than Asians and those of Hispanic origin.2 In countries of low incidence, e.g., Seoul, Korea, there has been a 10-fold increase in UC since the 1980s.2 To answer the specific question, one needs to study populations in the developing countries, obtain accurate figures for the incidence and prevalence of both CD, and UC and then compare these when migration occurs of these populations to countries where the incidence and prevalence is much higher, that is, in Europe or North America. This migration underscores the impact and importance of environmental risk factors. There is increasing knowledge of the importance of the bacterial population, resident in the human gut, and its influences on IBD. There are now known to be important bacterial epithelial cell interactions that are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of IBD. There are very few studies of the total population of bacteria in humans but there have been major breakthroughs in the ability to study these bacterial populations and they are now being applied to the IBD populations. As of yet, they have not been applied to countries where the prevalence is low and then restudied in the same people who migrate to countries where the prevalence is high. It will be this kind of crucial information that will pinpoint whether a move from developing to developed countries is accompanied by a corresponding change in colonic bacterial populations. Other possibilities could be the effect of infestations and parasites. The incidence of helminths is known to be high in developing countries and it is postulated that this is a potential factor in keeping the immune status of the individuals continually stimulated such that IBD does not develop.5 Benign eggs from worms have been used to treat CD with successful results in subjects residing in developed countries.6

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.006
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.006
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0020.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations20
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueInflammatory Bowel DiseasesSame topicInflammatory Bowel DiseaseFrench-language works237,207