The Unsettled Land: State-making and the politics of land in Zimbabwe 1893-2003, by Jocelyn Alexander
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since 2000, the politics of land in Zimbabwe has taken on greater regional and international importance, particularly as mass-mediated representations of the widespread evictions of white farmers and their workforce grabbed the attention of politicians, diplomats, policy makers, and the public throughout the world. The resulting increased interest in the politics of land in Zimbabwe and southern Africa more broadly has reinvigorated policy discussions concerning the redress of racially skewed land ownership inherited by post-colonial nations from their colonial predecessors and addressing rural, if not national development. Jocelyn Alexander's The Unsettled Land is a must-read for those involved in such discussions as well as those interested in African history and state formation more broadly, as it richly and astutely situates the current politics of land in Zimbabwe within the more relevant context of the making, unmaking, and contestation of state and other forms of authority in rural Zimbabwe. By grounding the unfolding land conflicts in this deeper politics, she raises very relevant points for anyone interested or involved in rural development issues in southern Africa and elsewhere.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it