MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070470388 · doi:10.1139/v07-128

Rotating ring-disk voltammetric investigations on the degradation rate of the nickel(III)-glycylglycyl-<scp>L</scp>-histidine complex

2007· article· en· W2070470388 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Marı́a V. Alipázaga, Denise Lowinsohn, Mauro Bertotti, Nina Coichev

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Chemistry · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicElectrochemical Analysis and Applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersFundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
KeywordsChemistryNickelCyclic voltammetryReaction rate constantElectrochemistryVoltammetrySulfiteRotating disk electrodeInorganic chemistryHistidineReaction mechanismAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ElectrodePhysical chemistryKineticsOrganic chemistryCatalysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The voltammetric behavior of the Ni(II)/glycylglycyl-L-histidine complex and the degradation of the electrogenerated Ni(III) species were investigated by cyclic voltammetry. Results of electrochemical and spectrophotometric experiments indicated some differences in the nature and reactivity of Ni(III) complexes formed by two independent routes, i.e., anodic oxidation of Ni(II) and homogeneous oxidation by an autocatalytic reaction in a medium containing oxygen and S(IV) (H 2 SO 3 , HSO [Formula: see text] , and SO[Formula: see text]). The Ni(III) species formed electrochemically reacts in a fast chemical process (EC mechanism) and the observed rate constant of the degradation (k = 0.17 s –1 ) was determined by a rotating ring-disk electrode technique measuring kinetic collection efficiency values as a function of the rotation rate. Key words: nickel, glycylglycyl-L-histidine, sulfite, degradation reaction, rotating ring-disk voltammetry.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.502

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.225
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of ChemistrySame topicElectrochemical Analysis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207