Negotiating the boundaries of home in bed-and-breakfast operations in Calgary, Alberta
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The operation of a bed-and-breakfast establishment involves commercializing at least some segments of a domestic space for use by "outsiders" or tourists. This challenges dualistic divisions of tourist and everyday spaces and contravenes the conventional notion of the home as an everyday private space for family. In redesigning the home as a bed-and-breakfast, the spatial organization is changed. This article presents a case study using participatory mapping to answer the question: What is the spatial impact on domestic space when parts of it are commercialized? L'exploitation d'un gîte du passant implique la commercialisation d'aux moins certains segments de l'espace domestique pour l'usage des «étrangers» ou de touristes. Cela remet en question les divisions dualistes du tourisme et les espaces quotidiens, et contrevient à la notion classique de la maison comme un espace privé familial. Selon cette recherche, l'organisation spatiale et familiale est modifiée par le gîte. Cet article présente une étude de cas utilisant la cartographie participative pour répondre à la question suivante: quel est l'impact de la commercialisation spatial sur l'espace domestique? Keywords: tourismhomesocio-spatial organizationparticipatory mappingMots-clés: tourismeespace spatialcartographie participative
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".