MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070555189 · doi:10.1139/cjfr-2014-0082

Real-time PCR detection and discrimination of the <i>Ceratocystis coerulescens</i> complex and of the fungal species from the <i>Ceratocystis polonica</i> complex validated on pure cultures and bark beetle vectors

2014· article· en· W2070555189 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Josyanne Lamarche, Don Stewart, G. Pelletier, Richard C. Hamelin, Philippe Tanguay

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Forest Research · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest Insect Ecology and Management
Canadian institutionsWestern Forest ProductsUniversity of British ColumbiaNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCeratocystisBiologyBark beetleBotanyOphiostomaSpecies complexBark (sound)EcologyPhylogenetic treeFungusCurculionidaeGeneticsGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Eight Ceratocystis Ellis & Halst. species belonging to the Ceratocystis coerulescens complex are pathogens causing blue-stain on Pinaceae. Three of these species, namely C. polonica, C. laricicola, and C. fujiensis, are particularly aggressive and can cause tree mortality. Although currently absent from the North American landscape, they are considered a significant potential threat to the Canadian boreal forest. As they are difficult to distinguish from native North American species belonging to the C. coerulescens complex, we developed a real-time PCR detection test for each of the three species to detect the equivalent of one fungal spore directly from insect vectors. DNA from at least one species of the C. coerulescens complex was detected on 86% of the beetles (Ips typographus (Linnaeus, 1758) and Ips cembrae (Heer, 1836)), whereas C. polonica DNA was detected on 60% of the I. typographus and C. laricicola DNA was detected on 84% of the I. cembrae. Between 20 and 344 225 spore equivalents were detected on the beetle specimens, and no inhibition effect of DNA extract from environmental samples was observed. These molecular detection tools will allow for rapid and reliable detection of C. polonica, C. laricicola, or C. fujiensis, allowing for a rapid implementation of eradication measures in case of introduction into Canada.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2014
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Forest ResearchSame topicForest Insect Ecology and ManagementFrench-language works237,207