MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070557909 · doi:10.1089/ten.tea.2009.0473

<i>In Vitro</i> Reconstruction of an Autologous, Watertight, and Resistant Vesical Equivalent

2009· article· en· W2070557909 on OpenAlexafffund
Sara Bouhout, Émilie Perron, Robert Gauvin, Geneviève Bernard, Gabrielle Ouellet, Valérie Cattan, Stéphane Bolduc

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering Part A · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchHealth CanadaCanadian Urological Association
KeywordsUrotheliumImmunostainingFibroblastTissue engineeringExtracellular matrixBiomedical engineeringUrinary bladderChemistryPathologyEpitheliumIn vitroAnatomyCell biologyBiologyMedicineImmunohistochemistryUrology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

PURPOSE: Currently, bladder repair is performed using gastrointestinal segments; however, this technique has a high morbidity rate, and new alternatives are thus needed. The lack of native or synthetic tissue with similar properties of the bladder led us to develop autologous vesical substitutes entirely made by tissue engineering and without exogenous matrices. Watertight function and mechanical resistance are fundamental for the model. The aim of this study was to determine the structural and functional characteristics of our vesical equivalent (VE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Porcine VEs are produced in 55 days. The cellular types that make up the vesical wall are extracted and purified simultaneously from a small porcine bladder biopsy. Dermal fibroblasts are extracted and cultured in vitro to form cellular sheets. Endothelial cells were seeded on the fibroblast sheets before their superimposition. Urothelial cells are then seeded onto this cellular construction. VEs are characterized by histology, immunostaining, electron microscopy, and cell viability. Mechanical properties of the reconstructed substitutes are evaluated by uniaxial tensile tests, and tissue absorption is verified with (14)C-urea, which quantifies the degree of impermeability. RESULTS: This process allowed us to obtain a highly structured tissue with a total fusion of the fibroblast layers. As expected, histological observations showed a pseudostratification of the urothelium developing on an organized self-secreted extracellular matrix. Positive markers for cytokeratin 8/18 in immunostaining confirmed the presence of a urinary epithelium. Electron microscopy confirmed the normal aspect of urothelial cells. Our VE's permeability to (14)C-urea was significantly similar to porcine bladder, and characterization of the mechanical properties indicated that our tissue could be suitable for grafting since its ultimate tensile strength compares favorably with a native porcine bladder. CONCLUSION: The construction of a VE using this method seems very promising in meeting the needs in the urological field. Our substitute has proven its efficiency as a barrier to urea and has a sufficient mechanical resistance to support suturing. Additionally, this model is completely autologous, and its possible endothelialization could promote the early vascularization process after grafting and thus significantly reducing inflammation and possible rejection.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations63
Published2009
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTissue Engineering Part ASame topicTissue Engineering and Regenerative MedicineFrench-language works237,207