Spatial Patterns of Natural Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons in Sediment in the Lower Athabasca River
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Athabasca Oil Sands is one of the four natural oil sands deposits in Northern Alberta, Canada, and are by far the largest oil sand deposit in North America, covering an area of 46,000 km2. Sediment samples were collected from the bed and bank of several tributaries that have naturally occurring exposures of oil sand material. Oil sand deposited along the lower Athabasca River, more than 100 km downstream of naturally occurring oil sand exposures, were also sampled. The levels of alkylated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in samples collected from these various locations ranged from not detected to almost 50 ppm. Using dibenzothiophene/chrysene (C2/D2 vs. C3/D3) double ratio plots, it is possible to approximate the relative degree of degradation or weathering of the PAHs from these various sediment deposits along the lower Athabasca River and its tributaries. Similarly a plot of dibenzothiophene/phenanthrene (D2/P2 vs. D3/P3) indicate the possible origins of the oil. A combination of these plots, D3/P3 vs. D3/C3, was particularly useful in identifying weathering characteristics of different sources of the oil. Comparison of alkylated PAH distributions between the lower Athabasca River and the tributaries show slight differences consistent with different petrogenic sources and/or different weathering patterns.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it