Estradiol Alters Nitric Oxide Production in the Mouse Aorta Through the α-, but not β-, Estrogen Receptor
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Although estradiol (E(2)) has been recognized to exert several vasculoprotective effects in several species, its effects in mouse vasomotion are unknown, and consequently, so is the estrogen receptor subtype mediating these effects. We investigated the effect of E(2) (80 microg/kg/day for 15 days) on NO production in the thoracic aorta of ovariectomized C57Bl/6 mice compared with those given placebo. E(2) increased basal NO production. In contrast, the relaxation in response to ATP, to the calcium ionophore A23187, and to sodium nitroprusside was unaltered by E(2), whereas acetylcholine-elicited relaxation was decreased. The abundance of NO synthase I, II, and III immunoreactive proteins (using Western blot) in thoracic aorta homogenates was unchanged by E(2). To determine the estrogen receptor (ER) subtype involved in these effects, transgenic mice in which either the ERalpha or ERbeta has been disrupted were ovariectomized and treated, or not, with E(2). Basal NO production was increased and the sensitivity to acetylcholine decreased in ERbeta knockout mice in response to E(2), whereas this effect was abolished in ERalpha knockout mice. Finally, these effects of E(2) on vasomotion required long-term and/or in vivo exposure, as short-term incubation of aortic rings with 10 nmol/L E(2) in the isolated organ chamber did not elicit any vasoactive effects. In conclusion, this study demonstrates that ERalpha, but not ERbeta, mediates the beneficial effect of E(2) on basal NO production.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".