Effects of HOXB4 Overexpression on Ex Vivo Expansion and Immortalization of Hematopoietic Cells from Different Species
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Overexpression of the human HOXB4 has been shown to induce the expansion and self-renewal of murine hematopoietic stem cells. In preparation for clinical studies, we wished to investigate the effects of HOXB4 on cells from other species, in particular preclinical large animals such as dogs and nonhuman primates. Thus, we transduced CD34(+) cells from nonhuman primates, dogs, and humans with a HOXB4-expressing gammaretroviral vector and a yellow fluorescent protein-expressing control vector. Compared with the control vector, HOXB4 overexpression resulted in a much larger increase in colony-forming cells in dog cells (28-fold) compared with human peripheral blood, human cord blood, and baboon cells (two-, four-, and fivefold, respectively). Furthermore, we found that HOXB4 overexpression resulted in immortalization with sustained growth (>12 months) of primitive hematopoietic cells from mice and dogs but not from monkeys and humans. This difference correlated with increased levels of retrovirally overexpressed HOXB4 in dog and mouse cells compared with human and nonhuman primate cells. The immortalized cells did not show any evidence of insertional mutagenesis or chromosomal abnormalities. Competitive congenic transplantation experiments showed that HOXB4-expanded mouse cells engrafted well after 1 or 3 months of expansion, and no leukemia was observed in mice. Our findings suggest that the growth promoting effects of HOXB4 are critically dependent on HOXB4 expression levels and that this can result in important species-specific differences in potency. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest is found at the end of this article.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".