MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070669699 · doi:10.1089/ten.tec.2009.0785

Enhanced Production of Red Blood Cells in Suspension by Electrostatic Interactions with Culture Plates

2010· article· en· W2070669699 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueTissue Engineering Part C Methods · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Canadian institutionsKootenay Association for Science & Technology
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEnucleationSuspension (topology)Suspension cultureStromal cellCell cultureChemistryBiophysicsRed blood cellMaterials scienceBiologyBiochemistryMathematicsGenetics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enucleation of erythroblasts, a critical step in the generation of red blood cells (RBCs), occurs at a low rate without cocultured stromal cells. Previously, the surface properties of the cell culture plate were not considered in the enucleation process, because the cells exist in suspension. Here, we show that a significantly higher rate of enucleation of erythroblasts occurred on the positively charged plates than on the negatively charged surfaces or the both negatively and positively charged plates. Also, the negatively and positively charged plate group showed a significantly higher enucleation than did the hydrophobic plates. Therefore, the plates fully coated with amine groups generated 1.88 times more enucleated RBCs than did the hydrophobic plates. This study suggests an important insight into the effect of surface characteristics of cell culture plates on suspension cell culture. Further, this simple and inexpensive procedure could contribute to a more efficient RBC production system, eliminating the need for robust and expensive coculture procedures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.215
Threshold uncertainty score0.435

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.308
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it