MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070692471 · doi:10.2741/1189

Human lipoprotein A - induced reduction of platelet aggregation is not mediated by apolipoprotein a s lysine-binding regions

2003· article· en· W2070692471 on OpenAlexaff
Douglas E. Barre

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLysineLipoprotein(a)PlateletChemistryLipoproteinIn vitroPlatelet aggregationApolipoprotein BBiochemistryAmino acidCholesterolBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intact lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) is known to decrease collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation in vitro, though the nature of the interaction between this lipoprotein and stimulated platelets is unknown. Lysine binding regions of Lp (a) facilitate binding between it and at least one cell type. Epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) renders Lp (a)'s lysine binding regions incapable of cellular interaction using those regions. Washed human platelets were presented vehicle alone or with varying concentrations of Lp (a) either not exposed or previously exposed to increasing levels of EACA. In all experiments, EACA failed to affect the impact of Lp(a) on platelet aggregation. It is concluded that the lysine binding regions of Lp (a) do not mediate the intact Lp(a)-induced reduction of collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation in vitro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.006

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFrontiers in bioscienceSame topicCell Adhesion Molecules ResearchFrench-language works237,207