MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070692471 · doi:10.2741/1189

Human lipoprotein A - induced reduction of platelet aggregation is not mediated by apolipoprotein a s lysine-binding regions

2003· article· en· W2070692471 on OpenAlex
Douglas E. Barre

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFrontiers in bioscience · 2003
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCell Adhesion Molecules Research
Canadian institutionsCape Breton University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLysineLipoprotein(a)PlateletChemistryLipoproteinIn vitroPlatelet aggregationApolipoprotein BBiochemistryAmino acidCholesterolBiologyImmunology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Intact lipoprotein (a) (Lp (a)) is known to decrease collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation in vitro, though the nature of the interaction between this lipoprotein and stimulated platelets is unknown. Lysine binding regions of Lp (a) facilitate binding between it and at least one cell type. Epsilon aminocaproic acid (EACA) renders Lp (a)'s lysine binding regions incapable of cellular interaction using those regions. Washed human platelets were presented vehicle alone or with varying concentrations of Lp (a) either not exposed or previously exposed to increasing levels of EACA. In all experiments, EACA failed to affect the impact of Lp(a) on platelet aggregation. It is concluded that the lysine binding regions of Lp (a) do not mediate the intact Lp(a)-induced reduction of collagen-stimulated platelet aggregation in vitro.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.681

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it