MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Meta-Analysis Of The Effects Of Pre-Exercise Hypohydration On Endurance Performance, Lactate Threshold And Vo2max

2010· article· en· W2070752806 on OpenAlexaff
Pierre-Yves Gigou, Martin Lamontagne-Lacasse, Eric Goulet

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSports Performance and Training
Canadian institutionsUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLactate thresholdVO2 maxAnalysis of varianceRandom effects modelMedicineMathematicsLinear regressionAnimal scienceStatisticsInternal medicineBlood lactateMeta-analysisHeart rateBlood pressureBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Exercise-induced dehydration (EID) ≥ 2% bodyweight (BW) impairs endurance performance (EP). It is unclear how pre-exercise hypohydration (PEH), which may impose physiological challenges differing from those of EID, affects EP, VO2 at lactate threshold (VO2LT) and maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max). PURPOSE: To determine the magnitude of the effects of PEH on EP, VO2LT and VO2max using a meta-analytic approach. METHODS: Studies were located via database searches and cross-referencing. Inclusion criteria: BW loss incurred ≥ 1h prior to the exercise tests; hydration level in the control group < 0.5% ≥ -1% BW; hypohydration level in the experimental group > 1% BW and > 0.5% than control. Exclusion criteria: diuretics- and caloric restriction-induced BW loss. STATISTICS: Random-effect model for mean weighted summary effects, random-effect (method-of-moments) meta-regression for relationships between variables and random-effect analog to the ANOVA for subgroup analyses. Mean changes in EP times during incremental or fixed-power output tests to exhaustion were converted to mean changes in power output. RESULTS: Twenty-nine research articles were retrieved, among which 10, 7 and 7 met the inclusion criteria for EP, VO2LT and VO2max, respectively, providing 14, 10 and 11 effect estimates. Mean BW decreases in all experimental groups were 3.9 ± 0.9% (SD) (range 2.6 to 5.6%). EP and VO2LT: Mean exercise test times among studies was 21 ± 15 min. Mean power output fell by 3.2% (95% CI: 2.4 to 4.0%) and VO2LT by 5.63% (95% CI: 2.8 to 8.4%) in hypohydrated group relative to control. Percent change in power output and VO2LT did not differ between studies with BW losses ≤ 4% or > 4%. Meta-regression analyses did not establish significant relationship patterns between BW losses and percent changes in power output or VO2LTs. VO2max: With PEH VO2max decreased by 2.4% (95% CI: 1.1 to 3.8%) compared with control group. Percent change in VO2max in studies with BW losses ≤ 4% was significantly lower than in those with BW losses > 4%. VO2max was found to decrease by 2.9% for each percent loss in BW above a threshold loss of 3.1% (P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Results indicate that PEH ≥ 3% BW impairs EP, VO2LT and VO2max in a practically important manner. Studies are required to establish how PEH in the 1-5% BW range affects EP during prolonged exercise.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.012
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.031
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Meta-analysis · Consensus signal: Meta-analysis
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.016
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0120.031
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0160.050
Bibliometrics0.0050.006
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0040.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designMeta-analysis
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseSame topicSports Performance and TrainingFrench-language works237,207