MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070756363 · doi:10.1088/0266-5611/31/4/045007

Fast quantitative microwave imaging with resolvent kernel extracted from measurements

2015· article· en· W2070756363 on OpenAlexaff
Sheng-Hung Tu, Justin J. McCombe, Denys S. Shumakov, Natalia K. Nikolova

Bibliographic record

VenueInverse Problems · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering Analysis
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResolventMicrowave imagingKernel (algebra)CalibrationMathematicsAlgorithmIterative reconstructionMicrowaveInversion (geology)Inverse problemOpticsMathematical analysisComputer scienceComputer visionPhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A quantitative imaging method is proposed based on microwave measurements where a direct inversion in real space is employed. The electrical properties of penetrable objects are reconstructed using a resolvent kernel in the forward model, which is extracted from calibration measurements. These measurements are performed on two known objects: the reference object (RO) representing the scatterer-free measurement and the calibration object representing a small scatterer embedded in the RO. Since the method does not need analytical or numerical approximations of the forward model, it is particularly valuable in short-range imaging, where analytical models of the incident field do not exist while the fidelity of the simulation models is often inadequate. The experimentally determined resolvent kernel inherently includes the particulars of the measurement setup, including all transmitting and receiving antennas. The inversion is fast, allowing for quasi-real-time image reconstruction. The proposed technique is demonstrated and validated through examples using simulated and experimental data. Its performance with noisy data is also examined. The concept of experimentally determined resolvent kernel in the forward model may be valuable in other imaging modalities such as ultrasound, photonic imaging, electrical-impedance tomography, etc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations38
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInverse ProblemsSame topicMicrowave Imaging and Scattering AnalysisFrench-language works237,207