MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070810697 · doi:10.1158/1538-7445.am2011-5152

Abstract 5152: The role of CCL21/CCR7 chemokine axis in breast cancer induced lymphangiogenesis

2011· article· en· W2070810697 on OpenAlexaffabout
Elena Tutunea-Fatan, Mousumi Majumder, Peeyush K. Lala

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLymphatic System and Diseases
Canadian institutionsWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCCL21LymphangiogenesisC-C chemokine receptor type 7ChemokineCancer researchLymphatic systemPodoplaninMetastasisLymphatic EndotheliumChemokine receptorBiologyImmunologyMedicineCancerReceptorInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Cellular and molecular mechanisms in lymphatic metastasis, a common occurrence in mammary carcinoma, remain poorly defined. A bidirectional communication pathway between tumor cells and lymphatic endothelial cells at the tumor-vessel interface enables guidance of sprouting lymphatic vessels towards tumors and instructs tumor cells to migrate to remote sites. Based on recent findings indicating (1) high expression of the chemokine receptor CCR7 in tumors developing in lymphatic-rich areas, (2) involvement of CCR7 chemokine ligand, CCL21, in organ-selective breast cancer metastasis, and (3) high levels of production of the lymphangiogenic molecule vascular endothelial growth factor-C (VEGF-C) by COX-2 expressing breast cancer cell lines, we suggest that the aforementioned bidirectional communication is orchestrated at molecular level by the interplay between CCL21/CCR7 chemokine axis and VEGF-C. Methods and results: We used the highly metastastic, COX-2 expressing and VEGF-C producing human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231 and primary cultures of human dermal lymphatic microvascular endothelial cells (HMVEC-dLy) as our two cell models in vitro. The constitutive expression of CCR7 receptor in both cell lines was confirmed by real-time PCR at the mRNA level, and by Western Blot, immunostaining, and FACS analysis at the protein level. Also, CCL21 ligand was found to be expressed at protein and mRNA levels by both cell lines. The lymphangiogenic potential of the CCL21/CCR7 axis in vitro was demonstrated with HMVEC-dLy cells for a concentration dependent, exogenous ligand-induced (1) proliferation (BrdU colorimetric assay), (2) migration (Boyden chamber assay across 8 μm pores of microporous membranes), and (3) morphogenesis (tube formation assay on growth factor-reduced Matrigel). Both proliferation and migration increased 2-2.5 fold after stimulation with CCL21 ligand (200-350 ng/ml) and decreased 1.8-2 times under inhibitory conditions (10 μg/ml CCR7 antibody). Tubular network formation (quantified through imaging) by HMVEC-dLy at 8 hours incubation increased 1.6 times in the presence of CCL21 (300 ng/ml) compared to basal conditions. Tubular network formation was blocked after a prior treatment with CCR7 antibody (10 μg/ml). Further investigations are in progress to test that CCR7 positive tumor cells regulate VEGF-C activity, with an underlying assumption that VEGF-C expression is in fact stimulated by CCL21/CCR7 interaction. Conclusion: These results in our in vitro model reveal for the first time the promoting role of CCL21/CCR7 axis in breast cancer-associated lymphangiogenesis. (Supported by grants awarded by the Ontario Institute of Cancer Research and the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, Ontario Chapter, to PKL, and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research – Cancer Research and Technology Transfer scholarship to ETF). Citation Format: {Authors}. {Abstract title} [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 102nd Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2011 Apr 2-6; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2011;71(8 Suppl):Abstract nr 5152. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2011-5152

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.114
Threshold uncertainty score0.998

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.107
GPT teacher head0.385
Teacher spread0.278 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicLymphatic System and DiseasesFrench-language works237,207