MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070812213 · doi:10.1136/jech.2011.142976m.44

P2-517 Socioeconomic status (SES) related to bone properties in Canadian adolescent females?

2011· article· en· W2070812213 on OpenAlexaffabout
Sabrina Imam, Martin C. Tammemägi, Panagiota Klentrou, Kimberley L. Gammage

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Epidemiology & Community Health · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBone health and osteoporosis research
Canadian institutionsBrock University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineDemographyBody mass indexSocioeconomic statusOsteoporosisPeak bone massMultilevel modelRegression analysisBone densityPediatricsGerontologyEnvironmental healthPopulationInternal medicineStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Introduction Osteoporosis is a bone condition characterised by low bone mass and increased susceptibility to fractures in older adults, particularly females. Peak bone mass (PBM) is accrued by age twenty in females. It is imperative adequate PBM be acquired in adolescent females to minimise future risk for osteoporosis. There is limited literature on the relationship between SES as a risk factor and bone properties in adolescent females. Methods In a cross-sectional study of Canadian adolescent females (n=412) from six randomly selected schools in Southern Ontario, multivariable regression analyses were used to assess the association between aggregate SES indices and bone speed of sound (SOS) in a multilevel model, participants nested in schools. Bone SOS was measured by transaxial quantitative ultrasound at the distal radius and mid-tibia. SES was determined by matching residential address for each participant with Statistics Canada 2006 Census data for their dissemination area. Results Mean age was 15.7±1.1 years. Multilevel analysis found a significant difference in SOS among schools at both radial and tibial sites (p<0.001). Multivariable regression analysis indicated significant positive relationships for median family income (p=0.036) and median household income (p=0.017) with tibial SOS adjusted for grade, weight, body mass index, smoking and alcohol use. Further analysis of average family income (p=0.035) and average household income (p=0.017) also indicated significant positive relationships with tibial SOS. Conclusion These data suggest school and SES at census aggregate variable level are important predictors for bone SOS in female adolescents, school appearing to dominate SES variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.013
Threshold uncertainty score0.096

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.235
GPT teacher head0.427
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Epidemiology & Community HealthSame topicBone health and osteoporosis researchFrench-language works237,207