MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070812436 · doi:10.1002/hep.25654

Pegylated interferon-associated retinopathy is frequent in hepatitis C virus patients with hypertension and justifies ophthalmologic screening

2012· article· en· W2070812436 on OpenAlexaff
Stela Vujosevic, Diego Tempesta, Franco Noventa, Edoardo Midena, Giada Sebastiani

Bibliographic record

VenueHepatology · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicHepatitis C virus research
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineRibavirinInternal medicineGastroenterologyRetinopathyHazard ratioHepatitis C virusPegylated interferonDiabetic retinopathyProspective cohort studyConfidence intervalHepatitis CSurgeryDiabetes mellitusImmunologyVirusEndocrinology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

UNLABELLED: Treatment with pegylated interferon alpha (PegIFNα) and ribavirin is still regarded as the standard of care for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV). Retinopathy has been occasionally described but prospective, longitudinal data are lacking. We investigated the frequency and clinical significance of retinopathy during therapy with PegIFNα and ribavirin in 97 consecutive HCV patients. In all, 54 (55.7%) and 43 (44.3%) patients were treated with PegIFNα 2a and PegIFNα 2b, respectively. Ophthalmologic examination was performed before therapy (baseline), at 3 and 6 months (3T and 6T, respectively) of therapy, and 3 months after the end of therapy (3ET). All patients underwent the baseline and 3T examination, 95.9% and 90.7% of patients underwent 6T and 3ET examination, respectively. Overall, 30.9% of patients developed retinopathy, as defined by the presence of cotton wool spots and/or retinal hemorrhages. Variables significantly associated with retinopathy during treatment were age (P = 0.004), metabolic syndrome (P = 0.05), hypertension (P < 0.0001), cryoglobulinemia (P = 0.05), and preexisting intraocular lesions at baseline (P = 0.01). By multivariate analysis, the only variable independently associated with PegIFNα-associated retinopathy was hypertension (hazard ratio [HR] = 4.99, 95% confidence interval [CI] 2.29-10.89). The frequency of retinopathy was significantly higher in hypertensive patients versus those without hypertension at all timepoints (18.5% versus 5.7% at baseline, P = 0.05; 48.1% versus 15.7% at 3T, P = 0.0009; 68.0% versus 19.1% at 6T, P < 0.0001; 32.0% versus 6.2%, P = 0.0005 at 3ET). In one (1.1%) hypertensive patient, who developed bilateral branch retinal vein occlusion at 6T, the therapy was discontinued. A cost analysis showed that screening for PegIFNα-associated retinopathy was cost-effective as compared with thyroid-stimulating hormone screening. CONCLUSION: Retinopathy is frequent during treatment with PegIFNα and ribavirin, especially in hypertensive patients, who may develop serious complications. Screening for PegIFNα-associated retinopathy should be recommended for HCV patients with hypertension.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.907

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.283
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHepatologySame topicHepatitis C virus researchFrench-language works237,207