MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070812753 · doi:10.1139/f00-123

Phosphorus dynamics in shallow subsurface waters in an uncut and cut subcatchment of a lake on the Boreal Plain

2000· article· en· W2070812753 on OpenAlexfundvenueno aff
James E. Evans, Ellie E. Prepas, K. J. Devito, Brian G. Kotak

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSoil and Water Nutrient Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaPhilanthropic Educational Organization
KeywordsWater tableHydrology (agriculture)Riparian zoneGroundwaterSurface runoffOrganic matterSurface waterGeologyPhosphorusSoil horizonPore water pressureSoil waterEnvironmental scienceSoil scienceChemistryEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Phosphorus dynamics in shallow subsurface waters (<2.5 m depth) were studied in harvested and unharvested subcatchments of a Boreal Plain lake. The organic soil layer was underlain by discontinuous layers of sand and clay glacial till. Total dissolved P (TDP) concentrations (6-798 µg·L -1 ) of discrete water samples from mineral layers (0.9-2.5 m deep) generally decreased with depth, were negatively related to Ca (r s < -0.7), and were lower in clay. When the groundwater table rose and saturated the organic layer, TDP concentrations increased in the composite (organic mineral layer) but not in the discrete (mineral layer) water samples, indicating that elevated TDP concentrations originate from the near-surface organic layer. TDP concentrations in composite samples were negatively correlated with water table depth (r s = -0.6) and were positively correlated with transmissivity (r s = 0.7) and dissolved organic C concentration (r s > 0.6). In the riparian buffer zone of the harvested subcatchment, TDP concentrations of composite samples decreased during high runoff, but these values remained higher than concentrations in the unharvested subcatchment. However, surface topography and variable depth to confining clay layers resulted in higher groundwater tables in the harvested subcatchment, especially in the cut area. Mean daily TDP export coefficients were similar between the unharvested (14 µg·m -2 ) and harvested (12 µg·m -2 ) subcatchments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.252
Threshold uncertainty score0.982

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.194
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations47
Published2000
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic SciencesSame topicSoil and Water Nutrient DynamicsFrench-language works237,207