MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2070845703 · doi:10.1139/p02-059

Studies on muonic dynamics of liquid DTH in dtμ muonic-molecule resonance formation and its comparison with a DT system

2002· article· en· W2070845703 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Mohammad Reza Eskandari, S. N. Hoseinimotlagh, Behrooz Rezaie

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2002
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuon and positron interactions and applications
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMuonPhysicsDeuteriumResonance (particle physics)HydrogenTritiumAtomic physicsNuclear physicsThermodynamicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent experimental and theoretical studies on muon-catalyzed fusion in a mixture of three gases, D–T–H, have shown that the muon-cycling-rate changes obtained are mostly in contradiction with each other and depend strongly on the physical conditions of the system. In this paper, we have considered the muon-cycling rate and its relevant nonlinear dynamical equations for mixtures of D–T and D–T–H in practical conditions where the muon-cycling rate is temperature; density of the mixture; and relative-particle concentration (deuterium, tritium, and hydrogen) dependent. Our theoretical method has shown that addition of protium to a D–T mixture leads to a significant decrease in the cycling rate, namely, by a factor of more than 15 in the liquid mixture and more than three in the gaseous mixture at 300–600 K. We show that the results obtained for given experimental conditions are in very good agreement with recent experimental values of Joint Institute for Nuclear Research in Dubna. The given reliable theoretical method leads us to determine the optimal condition of the muon-cycling rate such as relative-particle concentration in the resonance-temperature range at liquid hydrogen density, Φ = 1. It is shown that for a deuterium and tritium relative concentration of C d = C t = 0.45 with C p = 0.1 and ω s = 0.0029, a muon-cycling rate of 199 in the dtμ branch at 800 K is achievable, which compared to the D–T system in optimal conditions, still has a 29% enhancement. Finally, by energy-gain evaluation of resonance-muon-catalyzed fusion, we show that even this key step in high-yield μCF is far, far away from sufficiently minimal values to be of interest for practical applications of such a system. PACS No.: 25.30M

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.273
Threshold uncertainty score0.405

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.216 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations13
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicMuon and positron interactions and applicationsFrench-language works237,207